#Parallels vs vmware fusion 5 windows 8
For testing purposes, I used the final Windows 8 Developer Preview (which should be identical to the consumer version due out soon). In earlier reviews, I found that both Parallels and Fusion do well running earlier versions of Windows, so this time I focused on the upcoming Windows 8. While both Fusion and Parallels support literally hundreds of guest operating systems, most users will be employing them to run one or more flavors of Windows.
#Parallels vs vmware fusion 5 password
When using Parallels, however, I had some apps fail in Windows (which didn’t happen in Fusion), and there were times where I simply couldn’t type my password at the Linux login prompt. In Fusion, for example, entering and exiting full-screen mode causes more flicker and redraws than it does in Parallels. I didn’t have any outright crashes in either, but I did experience some minor oddities in both. If you need to open and close virtual machines all day, these time savings could add up.īoth virtualization apps are relatively stable. In some very simple testing, I found that Parallels is notably faster at each of those tasks, but particularly at suspending and resuming. The two virtualization apps do differ in speed-not the speed of the virtual OSes themselves or the apps in them, but the speed with which they open, sleep, resume, and shut down those OSes. There are a few differences, though, and that’s what I focused on in assessing the latest versions of each. They offer similar features, similar performance, and at times, even look similar.
Another result of this competition is that the two programs have evolved into near twins of each other.
0 kommentar(er)
